Legal Opinion

Crossett v. Midgley

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 23, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00125Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID D. CROSSETT, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 34) v. Case No. 1:24-cv-00125 TREVOR MIDGLEY, et al., District Judge David Barlow Defendants. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Plaintiff David Crossett has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.1 As explained below, because Mr. Crossett has already paid the filing fee and has not demonstrated he qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis, his motion is denied. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a federal court may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Lister v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API