Crossett v. Midgley
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID D. CROSSETT, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 34) v. Case No. 1:24-cv-00125 TREVOR MIDGLEY, et al., District Judge David Barlow Defendants. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Plaintiff David Crossett has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.1 As explained below, because Mr. Crossett has already paid the filing fee and has not demonstrated he qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis, his motion is denied. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a federal court may…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Lister v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001