Legal Opinion

Emerick v. Jackson Consol. Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1933No. 3872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

The chief question in this ease is the jurisdiction of the court to sell through its receiver the encumbered assets of an insolvent corporation, where the secured creditors object and there is no equity for the general creditors or stockholders.

The appellees, stockholders and general unsecured creditors of Jackson Consolidated Company, a domestic corporation (no stockholders’ liability), commenced this, a statutory proceeding for an injunction and receiver to wind up said corporation under 1929 Comp., § 32-174 et seq. Sections 3 and 4 of the complaint, filed on June 8, 1932,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Lembeck v. Jarvis Terminal Cold Storage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
  3. Maxwell Lumber Co. v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Reilly v. Penn Cordage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. Schiller, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API