Legal Opinion

United States v. Farr

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2012No. 11-6294PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

Defendant Skoshi Farr was convicted by a jury of violating 26 U.S.C. § 7201 for willfully failing to pay a trust fund recovery penalty that the Internal Revenue Service assessed against her after she, as the manager of an alternative medical clinic, failed to pay quarterly employment taxes owed by the clinic. Farr now appeals her conviction, contending she was denied her Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by the district court’s rulings which permitted the admission of Rule 404(b) evidence. She also contends the district court erred *1278in denying her motion for judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. LaHueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. AmbortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Yurek (Wendy)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Kupfer (Elizabeth)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. BoisseauDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  5. Byrnes v. ByrnesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API