Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ellis v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 1, 2010No. S09F1798Published

1DissentHunstein, Chief Justice

For the following reasons, I must respectfully dissent.

1. It is axiomatic that “[n]o verdict or judgment by default shall be taken in any [divorce] case.” OCGA § 19-5-8. Rather, regardless of whether the defendant files an answer or otherwise litigates the case, “the judge shall determine that the asserted grounds for divorce are legal and sustained by proof.” OCGA § 19-5-10 (a). Indeed, “even though notice of the hearing on the final decree is waived by failure to file responsive pleadings, the allegations of the petition must still be established by evidence. [Cit.]” Youmans v. Youmans, 247…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Green v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Lucas v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API