State Game & Fish Commission v. Louis Fritz Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion
The initial contention of appellee that it owns the soil or bed of the lake opposite its riparian lands and to the center or middle of the lake is well taken, and is established as correct by Richardson v. Sims, 118 Miss. 728, 80 So. 4. It owns the minerals thereunder, Archer v. Levee Com'rs, 158 Miss. 57,130 So. 55; Archer v. Greenville Sand Gravel Co., 233 U.S. 60, 34 S.Ct. 567, 58 L.Ed. 850, and by the same reason anything which becomes in the process of nature permanently attached thereto. Wineman v. Withers, 143 Miss. 537, 108 So. 708.
But appellee, as riparian owner and as owner of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Beach v. HaynerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Archer v. Greenville Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Steamboat Magnolia v. MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.