Legal Opinion
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Tolliver
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 2005No. 102,080PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
¶ 1 Pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 2001, §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma submitted the following question to this Court:
‘Whether Oklahoma law requires a finding that the insured intended to deceive the insurer before a misrepresentation, omission, or incorrect statement on an insurance application can serve as a ground to prevent recovery under the policy pursuant to Okla. Stat. Tit. 36 § 3609. See Hays v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co., 105 F.3d 583 (10th Cir.1997) ”
¶ 2 Title 20…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Cowen Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Vining Ex Rel. Vining v. Enterprise Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Claborn v. Washington National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hammock v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. QuineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Scruggs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- SILOAM SPRINGS HOTEL, LLC v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.