Legal Opinion

Alamo Chemical Transportation Co. v. M/V Overseas Valdes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1984No. Nos. 82-3498, 83-3201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (“Firestone”), failed to file this appeal within thirty days after the district court entered judgment because, and only because, its counsel had relied on the clerk of court to give notice of the entry of judgment and no such notice was received by counsel. Consequently, counsel did not learn of the judgment until the time for appeal had expired. Because the notice of appeal was filed too late, we dismiss the appeal.

This case is controlled by our en banc decision in Wilson v. The Atwood Group, 725 F.2d 255 (5th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mrs. Charlotte Wilson v. The Atwood Group and Occidental Petroleum Corp., Cross-Appellants v. Kirby L. Stark, Worldwide Drilling Consultants, Inc. And Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., Third-Party Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alamo Chemical Transportation Co., Cross-Appellant v. M/v Overseas Valdes, Her Engine, Etc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Intervenor-Appellant Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API