Legal Opinion · Dissent

Loewenstein v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1993No. S-91-255Published

1DissentCaporale, J.

I dissent; for when stripped to their essence, the transactions in question are nothing more than ones in which the plaintiffappellee, John Loewenstein, participated as a lender in loans secured by various governmental obligations. Therefore, state taxation of the income Loewenstein earned through those participations is not precluded by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution through the provisions of 31 U.S.C. § 3124 (1988), and Nebraska Department of Revenue Ruling 22-85-1, issued by the defendant-appellant, State of Nebraska, Department of Revenue, is valid.

Loewenstein is an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. McWilliams v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. American National Bank of Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. First National Bank of Atlanta v. Bartow County Board of Tax AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API