Legal Opinion
United States v. Trainor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 16, 2007No. 05-1553PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
The primary claim in this criminal appeal is the familiar one that a conspiracy conviction was flawed because the facts revealed multiple conspiracies rather than the single overarching scheme that was charged. The indictment against defendant-appellant William P. Trainor, charg ing both conspiracy to commit wire fraud and multiple episodes of the substantive crime, stemmed from his role in fraudulently securing mortgages on two adjacent properties owned by his family in Maine. Asserting that the conduct related to each property was separate, appellant argues that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Rafael Portela, United States of America v. Francisco Villaman-Rodrguez, United States of America v. Juan A. CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Mangual-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DellosantosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. DavilaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.