Legal Opinion

Howard v. Preston

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1966PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court obtained personal jurisdiction of the appellant so that a valid judgment of foreclosure could be entered as to her joint-ownership interest in the home. The suit was commenced by a summons and complaint which were given to a process server in the city of Milwaukee for personal service. When Mrs. Preston was not found at her home the process server telephoned her husband at his office and according to the process server’s testimony was told by Preston to send the papers over to Preston’s office and he would admit service for his wife and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hammond-Chandler Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gilbert-Arnold Land Co. v. O'HareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Township of Westport v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Madge Schultz v. Wayland SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Danielson v. Brody Seating Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Heaston v. AustinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re Incorporation of Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API