Erie Railroad v. Kreitner Bros.

Searle, P. J.,

Plaintiff claims the sum of $630.26, with interest from Sept. 10, 1920, said sum being the difference actually paid by defendant on freight upon twenty cars of brick, and the amount plaintiff claims was the correct charge which defendant should have paid in accordance with joint tariffs duly filed according to law.

Article II, section 1, of the Act of Assembly of July 26, 1913, P. L. 1374, provides as follows:

“It shall be the duty of every public service company ...

“b. To render and furnish all such service at prices, charges, rates, tolls, fares or compensation that shall be…