Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Appeal of Order of St. Paul First Hermit

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 2005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully concur and dissent. I disagree only with the majority’s holding that the Order of St. Paul the First Hermit (Appellant) failed to establish that the forty overnight rooms in the Retreat House at The National Shrine of Our Lady of Czestochowa (Shrine) are exempt from taxation under section 204(a)(1) of The General County Assessment Law (Assessment Law).1

Section 204(a)(1) of the Assessment Law provides that all “churches, meetinghouses, or other actual places of regularly stated religious worship, with the ground thereto annexed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mount Zion New Life Center v. Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes & AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Evangel Baptist Church v. Mifflin County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Benedictine Sisters of Pittsburgh v. Fayette County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Lee Publications, Inc. v. Dickinson School of Law of Pennsylvania State University Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Wesley United Methodist Church v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API