Legal Opinion

United States v. Myatt

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1920Published

Criminal prosecution by the United States against W. A. Myatt. On motion to quash indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

The grand jury returned a bill of indictment in which it presented that defendant, on December 20, 1919—

“while doing business as a retail grocer in the city of Raleigh and during the existence of a state of war involving the United States, and while the United States was at war with Imperial Germany and Austria-Hungary, the said W. A. Myatt knowingly, unlawfully, and willfully, in handling and dealing in certain necessaries, to wit, granulated sugar, did make an unjust and unreasonable charge; that is to say, the said W. A. Myatt did then and there as such retail grocer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Reese v. Pennsylvania R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API