Verdigris River Drainage District No. 1 v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*324The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action for money. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals. 1
The petition alleged the nature of the parties and that the plaintiff was located in Montgomery county and many years ago had constructed and at the time the action was begun maintained a levee on the north, east and south sides of the district for the purpose of preventing the floodwaters of the Verdigris river from inundating the territory within the district; that about 1921 state highway 169 ■crossed the district from the north to south; that it was then a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Verdigris River Drainage District No. 1 v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Alber v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Ruff v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Verdigris River Drainage District No. 1 v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- John E. Kirchner v. The Kansas Turnpike AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Harbor Land Co. v. Township of Grosse IleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Jayhawk Racing Props., LLC v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.