Mooring v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lawson Cloninger, Judge.
Appellant, John Wayne Mooring, was tried and convicted of the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. He now brings this appeal.
His first point for reversal is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor. A directed verdict is only proper when there is no issue of fact for the jury to decide. In resolving the issue, an appellate court should review the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee and affirm if there is any substantial evidence to support the verdict. Burks v. State, 255 Ark. 23, 498 S.W.2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Hosto v. BrickellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Environmental Improvement Agency v. Albuquerque Publishing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deviney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Honea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985