Legal Opinion
Weiss
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 28, 1955No. 21-53PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This case comes before the court on the motion of May 4,1954, made under a special appearance of third party defendants Harry D. Hirsch and Charlotte B. Hirsch, under rule 16 (b) (1), denying the jurisdiction of the court; said third party defendants having been impleaded on motion of defendant, the United States, under section 14 (b) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U. S. C. 114 (b), (58 Stat. 663). Said section provides in part as follows:
“The Court of Claims, on motion of either of the parties, or on its own motion, may summon any and all persons with legal capacity to be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hardin County Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rolls-Royce Limited, Derby, England, a British Company v. The United States and United Aircraft Corporation, Defendant-IntervenorUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Oliver-Finnie Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Oak Forest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992