Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Stewart v. Stewart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 20, 1989No. 89-100Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShivers, Chief Judge

I concur in part and dissent in part. Canakaris is our polestar and I believe that under the law and the circumstances of this case we should reverse the awarding of rehabilitative rather than permanent alimony. I would, however, affirm the remainder of the trial court’s final judgment.

The parties met and became engaged while both were students at Emory University. They married in 1970 after they had both completed their undergraduate studies. The wife accompanied her husband to medical school at the University of Alabama and gave up her own graduate school and career plans. The wife worked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. O'Neal v. O'NealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Wilson v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Garrison v. GarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Cosgrove v. CosgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API