Newark Morning Ledger Co., as Successor to the Herald Company v. The United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by the United States from an adverse judgment of the district court in a tax refund case raises important questions concerning a taxpayer’s ability to depreciate acquired intangible assets. Taxpayer/appellee Newark Morning Ledger Co. (“Morning Ledger”) acquired a corporation, which itself had previously acquired the assets of eight Michigan newspapers by means of an I.R.C. §§ 332, 334(b)(2) liquidation, and which had attempted to depreciate some $67 million of the purchase price as allocated to a category denominated “paid subscribers.”…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Richard M. Boe and Mary Lots Boe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Houston Chronicle Publishing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Seaboard Finance Company, Seaboard Finance Company, Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Charles W. Balthrope and Mary v. Balthrope v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Manhattan Co. of Virginia, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Canterbury v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Colorado National Bankshares, Inc., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Capital Blue Cross & Subsidiaries v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
- Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.