Salisbury v. Bartleson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Bartleson, (impleaded with Henry C. Brack-ett,) from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, in an action on the note described in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
The defendant Brackett, at Minneapolis, in this state, on February 28, 1887, executed his promissory note, payable *366in 90 days, to the order of the defendant Bartleson, (no place of payment being stated,) who thereupon indorsed it to plaintiffs. At the making of the note, and ever since, Bartleson resided, and plaintiffs’ place of business was, in Minneapolis. At that time Brackett resided at River Falls, Wis., which fact was known to the indorsees. When the note came due he had left River Falls, and become a resident of Minneapolis; but it is not found'that this was known to them. No .attempt…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. SnyderNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- McGruder v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Foster v. . JulienNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Adams v. . LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farwell v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Young v. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913