Kruzas v. O'Dowd
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
The allegations in the petition do not set out any infringement of the plaintiff’s rights. The contention that when a sentence for violation of the liquor law has been suspended it can' thereafter be enforced only upon proof of a subsequent violation of the same law is not well founded. Couture v. Brown, 82 N. H. 459. But it is alleged that in this instance there was an understanding that the condition to be complied with was so limited in fact. Assuming that the record could be amplified or modified by proof of such understanding, the case stands no better. The sentence was enforced because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sylvester v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
- Petition of MoebusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
- Broderick v. HuntSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
- Couture v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Philpot v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rubera v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Stone v. SheaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Stone v. SheaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973