Legal Opinion

People v. J.S.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1984No. 59319, 59320, 59556 consPublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

In each of the three cases consolidated in this appeal, the trial judge dismissed the respective indictment or information against the defendant on the grounds that the legislature could not constitutionally provide that 15- and 16-year-old defendants must be prosecuted in the adult criminal courts for the crimes of murder, rape, deviate sexual assault, and armed robbery with a firearm. The statute which is in question is section 2 — 7(6) of the Juvenile Court Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 37, par. 702— 7(6)), which provides:

“(a) The definition of delinquent minor under Section 2 — 2 of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People Ex Rel. Carey v. ChrastkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. The People v. PardoIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Zimmerman Brush Co. v. Fair Employment Practices CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. The PEOPLE v. SirinskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Rodríguez Rodríguez v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  3. People v. P.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. JosephIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2015

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API