Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 1984No. 494, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOOM, Judge.

On the basis of stipulated testimony, the Circuit Court for Carroll County convicted appellant, Ira Ross, of unlawfully intercepting oral communications and of unnatural and perverted sexual practice. Ross was sentenced to a term of five years imprisonment for interception of oral communications and a consecutive term of ten years for perverted sexual practice.

Ross poses the following questions on appeal:

1. Whether the trial court committed error in denying appellant’s motion to suppress a pornographic videotape seized pursuant to a search and seizure warrant.

2. Whether the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Coomes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. State v. El Dorado Management Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Sutton v. State of Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API