Legal Opinion

JEROME v. Laurel Pipe Line Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1962No. Appeal, 223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

The court below refused plaintiffs’ motion for new trial in a land condemnation case.

They allege that a new trial is necessary because of the inadequacy of the jury’s verdict of $900, with interest, and because of four alleged trial errors.

Under its authority as a public service corporation, Laurel Pipe Line Company condemned a 30-foot right of way for the installation of an 18-inch oil pipe line extending about 466 feet through plaintiffs’ land situate in Springdale Borough, Allegheny County. The piece of land, somewhat triangular in shape, adjoining Route 28, was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springer v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Mazur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Weintraub AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. St. Clair Cemetery Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Stevenson v. East Deer TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duffy v. National Janitorial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Carroll v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Judy Ellyn, Inc. v. Hyde Park Fashions, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Graham v. Jonnel Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Brandywine Lanes, Inc. v. Pittsburgh National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API