Watley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Andre Watley, was convicted under D.C.Code § 48-904.01(a)(l) (2001) for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Appellant’s subsequent motion to vacate his conviction pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 (2001) on the basis of ineffective assistance of trial counsel was denied. We have consolidated Watley’s appeal from that denial with the direct appeal of his conviction. Appellant’s claim that his counsel was ineffective in failing to file a Fourth Amendment suppression motion has sufficient facial merit to require a hearing; therefore, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Chew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Chew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Dorsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.