Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Roetting

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 26, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00266Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SHAREENA BROOKS, Case No: 1:24-cv-266 Plaintiff, Bowman, M.J. v. MICHAEL P. ROETTING, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 On March 7, 2024, Plaintiff filed this civil rights case in state court against City of Cincinnati Police Officer Michael P. Roetting and two John and Jane Doe police officers, alleging injury as a result of being tased by Defendant Roetting. Defendants removed the case to this court. Currently pending is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons stated,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API