Legal Opinion

Djenasevic v. Exec. Office of U.S. Attorneys

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 14, 2018No. Case No: 16-cv-2085-RCLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Statute of Limitations

First, defendants assert that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Actions to enforce rights under the Privacy Act must be brought "within two years from the date on which the cause of action arises ...." 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(5) ; see also Blazy v. Tenet , 979 F.Supp. 10, 22 n. 6 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing Tijerina v. Walters , 821 F.2d 789, 798 (D.C. Cir. 1987). For the purposes of determining when the cause arose, "the statute of limitation does not begin to run until the 'plaintiff knows or should know of the alleged violation.' " Kursar v. TSA, 751…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Valencia-Lucena v. United States Coast GuardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anand v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  2. Bloomberg L.P. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  3. Christopher Lamar McNear v. Person Directed Supports, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Garza v. United States Marshal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. THOMAS v. BRANDYWINE HOSPITAL, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API