Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Truesdell

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided November 22, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Motion by plaintiff, Joseph Atkinson, to resettle costs of motion for a new trial, made by defendant, Titus B. Truesdell. From an order granting plaintiff’s motion, defendant appeals. For former litigation between same parties, see 6 H. Y. Supp. 509.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The order appealed from resettles an order granted at special term denying defendant’s motion for a new trial on the case, etc., by striking *802out from said order the words “$10, ” leaving in lieu thereof a blank space, wherein the clerk may, after taxation, insert the amount of statutory costs allowed on a motion for a new trial on the case by the Code; and the only papers presented to the court on this appeal is the order of March 29,1889, which recites that a motion was made by defendants for a new trial upon the case herein made and settled, on the ground that the trial court permitted an…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API