Legal Opinion
George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Inglis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1925No. 4295-4299PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoorman, Circuit Judge
(after, stating the facts as above). In the first four eases there is presented primarily the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court to determine the controversy between the bank and the intervening claimants. Each of the claimants was a resident of the state of Ohio, the bank was a state institution, and no one of the claims was for as much as $3,000. The jurisdictional question was not raised in the lower court. ’ The fund was drawn into court by petition of the receiver, and the intervening claimants filed their respective petitions claiming a part of it. The bank, without…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- City Railway Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Indemnity Co. v. Spring Branch State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Commercial Nat. Bank of Independence v. Stockyards Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- American Surety Co. v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- First Nat. Bank of Indianola v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Storing v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.