State v. Simon, State v. Redway
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mary Redway and Alexander Simon appeal from criminal judgments entered after the district court found Redway guilty of disorderly conduct and Simon guilty of disorderly conduct and physical obstruction of a government function. They argue their participation in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline was constitutionally protected activity that should have been excluded from evidence and there was insufficient evidence to support their convictions. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Redway and Simon participated with a group of about 150 other individuals in a protest against the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Bismarck v. NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Bismarck v. SchoppertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Fargo v. RoehrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025