Public Loan Corp. v. Hood
Butler County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By CRAMER, J:
This cause was submitted to the court upon the pleadings, consisting of petition, answer, and reply, and upon the evidence. The court heard the same without the intervention of a jury.
In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover upon a promissory note *425upon which there is due the sum of $725.45, which note was executed by the defendants herein, — husband and wife — on November 29, 1952 in the principal sum of $660.00. The note sued upon represented an increase over a previous loan made by the defendants which increase amounted to approximately $100.00. As a matter of fact,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ohio Finance Co. v. GreathouseOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- In re WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Local Industrial Finance Company v. McDougaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- California Bank v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Green v. Southern Poultry CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.