In re Leschinsky

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for lack of patentability in view of the cited prior art, claims 22 to 27, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent.

Upon the oral hearing before us appellant moved to dismiss the appeal with respect to claims 23 and 24, and it will be so ordered.

Of the remaining claims, viz, 22 and 25 to 27, inclusive, claim 22 is illustrative and reads as follows:

22. The combination with a vehicle frame, of a bulldozer pushing element, means pivoted on the…