Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Hadnott

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 28, 2006No. A07A0190PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following the entry of summary judgment against him in his personal injury action against James Hadnott, Dwayne Ellis appeals pro se, arguing that Hadnott breached a duty owed to Ellis as licensee when Ellis tripped over a broom handle in Hadnott’s residence. Because the duty owed licensees pertains to hidden perils and dangerous acts, we affirm, holding that under the undisputed facts of this case, the broom handle was not a hidden peril or a dangerous act.

1. Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Moon v. Homeowners' Ass'n of Sibley Forest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Cooper v. Corporate Property InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Biggs v. Brannon Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matlack v. Cobb Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Jones v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Esposito v. Pharr Court Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Harrison v. Legacy Hous., LPDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2018
  5. Jordan v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API