Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Hankins
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided July 22, 1952No. Civ. 2304PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
This suit is brought to the attention of the court at this time by the reason that the Highway Mutual Casualty Company, hereinafter called the “Company”, has filed a motion for leave to intervene and to file a petition seeking a declaratory judgment. The essential alleged facts are set forth in the pleadings, motion, and petition. Plaintiff Harry J. Knapp, Jr., on January 9, 1952 filed a complaint under the Illinois Dram Shop Act, 43 Ill.Rev.Stat. Sec. 135, alleging that on March 15, 1950 he was injured as a result of being struck by a car driven by one Paul Jolly; that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Simms v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co. Virginia Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Service Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Apex Mutual Insurance v. ChristnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.