Legal Opinion

Plante v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 8, 1968No. 65 Civ. 871Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as the executrix of her husband’s estate, brought this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FE LA), 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to recover compensation for injuries incurred by her husband while in the employ of defendant as a freight brakeman. • Defendant now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., on the ground that plaintiff’s action is barred because plaintiff’s testator already recovered compensation for these injuries under the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (Longshoremen’s Act), 33…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Hertel v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API