Legal Opinion

Stewart v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 1982No. 80-050, CA A20533Published

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

In this land-use case, private petitioners L. L. Stewart, Booth, Giustina, Fischer, Chapman, F. H. Stewart and Richard seek Supreme Court review of this court’s opinion in Stewart v. City of Eugene, 57 Or App 627, 646 P2d 74 (1982). We treat their petition as one for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. They contend, inter alia, that our former opinion misstates a fact pertaining to the geographical proximity of the City of Eugene to the land whose rezoning was the subject of the case and that the misstated fact was crucial to our conclusion that the City of Eugene had standing to contest the new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Or. v. MULTNOMAH CTY., ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Ruegg v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS, CLACKAMAS CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Stewart v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API