Legal Opinion

People v. Leal

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2009No. H031174PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUFFY, J.

Following denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5),1 defendant Raul Anthony Leal pleaded no contest to obliterating the identification of a firearm (§ 12090). The trial court placed defendant on probation for three years subject to various conditions. On appeal, defendant contended that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress. He argued that the search conducted incident to his arrest was beyond the scope of the arm’s reach rule of Chimel v. California (1969) 395 U.S. 752 [23 L.Ed.2d 685, 89 S.Ct. 2034]. He also challenged the imposition…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. LealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API