Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. McDaniel
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 23, 2010No. CV 09-369-PKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiff Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA) brings this action arising from the travel management planning process for the Steens Mountain. ONDA names as defendants the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), Kenny McDaniel, District Manager for the Burns District of BLM, and Joan Suther, Field Manager for the Andrews Resource Area of the Burns District of BLM. 1 Specifically, ONDA alleges that BLM’s adoption of the Travel Management Plan violates the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 2000…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Desert Citizens Against Pollution v. BissonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farrell-Cooper Mining Co. v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Cloud Foundation, Inc. v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Nation v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Cayuga Nation v. ZinkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018