Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2002No. 02-135PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

¶1 Following his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in Treasure Comity Justice Court, the Defendant, Daniel D. Hamilton, appealed to the District Court for the Sixteenth Judicial District in Treasure County where he received a nonjury trial de novo. Following that trial, he was again convicted of DUI. Hamilton appeals his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

¶2 Hamilton raises two issues on appeal. We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it admitted evidence of blood test results that were gathered approximately three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DuffyMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. McNallyMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. EnrightMontana Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LeggMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Cody ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. VanderslootMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Marriage of Crone v. CroneMontana Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API