Tibbetts v. Kulongoski
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Oregon Governor Theodore Kulongoski appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. Plaintiffs-Appellees, who are former employees of the State Accident Insurance Fund, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging, among other claims, that Governor Kulongoski violated their Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by making stigmatizing statements about them in two press releases without providing them name-clearing hearings.
Because the relevant parameters…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Grenning v. KlemmeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
- Blantz v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Ronald Kramer v. Mary CullinanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Janelle Perez v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.