Legal Opinion

Tibbetts v. Kulongoski

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2009No. 07-36067PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Oregon Governor Theodore Kulongoski appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. Plaintiffs-Appellees, who are former employees of the State Accident Insurance Fund, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging, among other claims, that Governor Kulongoski violated their Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by making stigmatizing statements about them in two press releases without providing them name-clearing hearings.

Because the relevant parameters…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Grenning v. KlemmeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
  2. Blantz v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Ronald Kramer v. Mary CullinanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Janelle Perez v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API