Bayat v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
JEROME B. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Currently before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. After examination of the briefs and record, this court determines oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. The court, for the reasons set out fully herein, GRANTS the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. Factual Background
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- James D. Booker v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Billy Wayne Sinclair v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Steven Finkelstein v. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.