Legal Opinion

State v. Clardy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 2018No. A164223PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*891Defendant appeals from a punitive contempt judgment on 10 counts of punitive contempt. ORS 33.065. The trial court found defendant in contempt on all 10 counts, and it imposed punitive sanctions. Defendant raises two assignments of error on appeal. We reject his first assignment of error without written discussion. On his second assignment of error, we reverse and remand.

In that assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by entering a judgment that refers to the contempt counts as convictions. The judgment lists the contempt counts under the heading "CONVICTION."…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. LarranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Shamsud-DinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API