United States v. Yepa
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is whether self-incriminating statements by Defendant Gavin Yepa during a search of his person authorized by a warrant were spontaneous or were the result of interrogation. We affirm the district court’s ruling that the statements were spontaneous. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm Defendant’s conviction.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico of first-degree felony murder in the perpetration of aggravated sexual abuse in Indian country. See 18 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fox v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Thomas Norman GayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WidmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- In re S.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- United States v. DeleonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- State of Florida v. Justin David LantzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.