Legal Opinion

United States v. Yepa

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2017No. 16-2060PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether self-incriminating statements by Defendant Gavin Yepa during a search of his person authorized by a warrant were spontaneous or were the result of interrogation. We affirm the district court’s ruling that the statements were spontaneous. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm Defendant’s conviction.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico of first-degree felony murder in the perpetration of aggravated sexual abuse in Indian country. See 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fox v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Thomas Norman GayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WidmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  2. United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. In re S.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. United States v. DeleonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  5. State of Florida v. Justin David LantzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API