Legal Opinion
Ladd v. Parnell
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,769PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twenty-third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
The judgment in this cause is affirmed. The sureties on the undertaking upon appeal were notified of the motion for judgment, and failed to appear. We see nothing in the point that § 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing judgment on motion against the sureties, where they have subscribed such an undertaking as is required by that section, is unconstitutional.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Davis v. HeimbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888