Legal Opinion

Loughlin v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1946Published

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of a fall on a wet subway platform. Plaintiff recovered a judgment and defendant appeals. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The findings of fact implicit in the verdict are affirmed. No negligence on the part of the defendant was established. (Brand V. Inter-borough B. T. Go., 249 App. Div. 630, affd. 273 N. Y. 658; Abair v. City of New York, 295 N. Y. 789; Boettcher v. Dowling, 270 N. Y. 557.) The case.of Bordes v. Murray (284 N. Y. 761) is not to the contrary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boettcher v. DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Abair v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Brand v. Interborough Rapid Transit CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Bordes v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API