Scarola v. Insurance Co. of North America
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHarry T. Nusbaum, J.
In this action on an insurance policy, the assured seeks to recover the value of the car designated in the policy, following the theft of the car. The defendant, insurance company denies liability claiming the assured did not have an insurable interest in the stolen car.
*270After trial, the jury, by a special verdict found, that the plaintiff did in fact purchase a car, that at the time of purchase the car was in fact a stolen car and that the plaintiff was an innocent purchaser in that the plaintiff did not know that the automobile he purchased was a stolen car.
The issue clearly presented is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Friscia v. Safeguard InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Lindner v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Treit v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Treit v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972