Ponevyezh Building & Loan Ass'n v. Shandelman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This is an appeal from an order of the court below making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment by confession against the defendant should not be opened. As the appellant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to warrant the opening of the judgment, it is necessary for us to state the substance of the testimony.
The defendant having admitted the exéeution of the bond, the judgment is presumably valid, although she was a married woman at the time (Abell v. Chaffee, 154 Pa. 254, 26 A. 364; Nuding v. Urich, 169 Pa. 289, 32 A. 409); and she must show…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greenfield' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Nuding v. UrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Abell v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Algeo v. FriesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phillips v. Coxe Brothers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. GarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Land Bank v. . GarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942