Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Middlebrooks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1933No. 22656PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. It is not essential to the relationship of landlord and tenant that the landlord be the owner of the premises. That relationship may be established where one not the owner of premises leases them to another, and the latter is in possession under the contract as a tenant. Scott v. Berry, 46 Ga. 394; Morgan v. Morgan, 65 Ga. 493; Spence v. Wilson, 102 Ga. 762 (29 S. E. 713).

2. Where a person, after agreeing with a prospective tenant to lease to him certain premises, referred him to another person, stating that the rentals had been turned over to that person, and where the prospective tenant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spence v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Scott v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wall Realty Co. v. LeslieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Hill v. Liebman Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Oglesby v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Bates v. Chapman-Baldwin Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Graham v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API