Legal Opinion

In Re Bill of Lading Transmission & Processing System Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 11, 2009No. MDL 2050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Common party R + L Carriers, Inc. (R + L) has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio. Plaintiffs in the District of Minnesota action (PeopleNet) and District of Utah action (DriverTech) and defendant in the Southern District of Ohio Pegasus action oppose centralization.

This litigation currently consists of eight actions listed on Schedule A and pending as follows: six actions in the Southern District of Ohio and an action each in the District of Minnesota and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Dept. of Veterans Affairs (Va) Data Theft LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortgage-Backed Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API