Legal Opinion
FITZGERALD v. O'MALLEY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 10, 2025No. 2:24-cv-04241Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PATRICK F.,1 : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. : No. 24-4241 : FRANK BISIGNANO, : Commissioner of Social Security, : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION HON. JOSÉ RAÚL ARTEAGA October 10, 2025 United States Magistrate Judge2 The Commissioner of Social Security, through an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), determined that Plaintiff Patrick F. was not disabled and denied his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, and for Supplemental Security Income…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.