Legal Opinion
State v. Reddy
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 5, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
130 N.J. Super. 14 (1974)
324 A.2d 607
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHARLES REDDY AND ROBERT REDDY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
August 5, 1974.
Mr. Richard L. Friedman for the State (Mr. Thomas F. Shusted, Prosecutor of Camden County, attorney).
Mr. Andrew G. Gay admitted pro hac vice, for defendant Robert Reddy (Mr. Michael A. Ferrara, Jr., of counsel).
Mr. John T. Grigsby, III, admitted pro hac vice, for defendant Charles Reddy (Mr. Michael A. Ferrara, Jr., of counsel).
KING, J.C.C. Temporarily Assigned.
This is a motion for a new trial following convictions of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. Van DuyneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- State v. JasuilewiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- State v. ReddyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State v. VarleseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979